Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Louisa Chirico vs Ganna Poznikhirenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chirico vs Poznikhirenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Louisa Chirico vs Ganna Poznikhirenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chirico has won 47.69% of points on his second serve, while Poznikhirenko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chirico, in recent form, has won 57.25% of his opponent's second serve points, while Poznikhirenko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.77% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chirico has saved 53.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Poznikhirenko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chirico has won 55.38% of matches played (W/L 36/ 29), with Poznikhirenko winning 59.09% (W/L 13/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chirico has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 151/ 93), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 5/ 7). Poznikhirenko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 173/ 101), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 42/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Chirico has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.49% of matches (W/L 31/ 22), where as Poznikhirenko has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 13/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chirico winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Chirico winning 0 and Poznikhirenko winning 1. The last match between Chirico and Poznikhirenko was at the W60 Templeton, 27-09-2023, First, Hard with Louisa Chirico getting the victory 2-3 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:20:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chirico and Poznikhirenko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Chirico winning 0 times and Poznikhirenko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chirico winning 0, and Poznikhirenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chirico has played against opponents with an average rank of 219.06 while Poznikhirenko has played against players with an average rank of 254.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chirico has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Poznikhirenko has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chirico has converted 51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Poznikhirenko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chirico 1 - 0 Poznikhirenko
222
Rank
58
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
621
Rank
255
High
30
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
56% (299-232)
Career Total W/L
61% (306-197)
57% (16-12)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$623,285
Career Prize Money
$823
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Chirico VS Poznikhirenko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Ganna Poznikhirenko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 1 |
| Games Won | 2 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:20:0 | 0:20:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (10/16) | 45% (5/11) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 40% (4/10) | 60% (3/5) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (3/6) | 33% (2/6) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (6/11) | 56% (9/16) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Chirico VS Poznikhirenko H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-3 ret. |
Stats 
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ganna Poznikhirenko
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve %
45%
(
5 of
11)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
13
Total Points Won
14
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Louisa Chirico | Ganna Poznikhirenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (16/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 57% (36/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (323/285) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (15/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 64 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 122 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:45 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 205.21 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1302/2080) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (792/1302) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (371/778) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (127/249) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (934/2012) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (16/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 56% (15/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 38% (3/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 78% (18/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 22% (18/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Louisa Chirico Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Danilovic
Player
Louisa Chirico
58%
(
71 of
123)
1st Serve %
60%
(
75 of
126)
4
Aces
5
10
Double Faults
8
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
46%
(
24 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
46%
(
57 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
61 of
126)
127
Total Points Won
122
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Unknown Player
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Louisa Chirico
60%
(
53 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Emily Appleton
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
32 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
60%
(
56 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
88
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Kayla Day
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Maya Joint
68%
(
51 of
75)
1st Serve %
74%
(
58 of
78)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Valentini Grammatikopoulou
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
80%
(
81 of
101)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
39 of
69)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
51 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
112
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Allie Kiick
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
14
Total Points Won
8
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Ganna Poznikhirenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Louisa Chirico
Player
Ganna Poznikhirenko
63%
(
10 of
16)
1st Serve %
45%
(
5 of
11)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
40%
(
4 of
10)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
13
Total Points Won
14
|
2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ganna Poznikhirenko
Player
Maria Kozyreva
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ganna Poznikhirenko
Player
Sabastiani Leon
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victoria Hu
Player
Ganna Poznikhirenko
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
48%
(
29 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
42 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ganna Poznikhirenko
Player
Marine Partaud
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ganna Poznikhirenko
Player
Elysia Bolton
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ganna Poznikhirenko
Player
Katja Wiersholm
68%
(
88 of
129)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
5
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
29%
(
12 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
49%
(
63 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
101)
121
Total Points Won
109
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aliaksandra Sasnovich
Player
Ganna Poznikhirenko
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Ganna Poznikhirenko
82%
(
50 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ganna Poznikhirenko
Player
Moyuka Uchijima
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
34 of
74)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
10
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Chirico Vs Poznikhirenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
